Publication_Ethics

Publication Ethics

Al Hisbah: Journal of Islamic economics is a journal that aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focusing on zakat, infaq, shodaqoh and waqf (ZISWAF), income, scarcity, development in an Islamic economics perspective, happiness in an Islamic economics perspective as well as other topics related to Islamic economics and those has not been published elsewhere in any language, nor is it being reviewed for publication anywhere. The following statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the author, editor, reviewer, and publisher (Tafaqquh Fiddin Dumai Islamic Religious Institute).

Confidentiality

Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in an editor's own research without written consent from the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that its rapid review is not possible must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editors.

Standards of Objectivity

The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant and up-to-date citation. Reviewers should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other association or association with any author, company, or institution associated with the paper.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be presented accurately in the paper. Papers must contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are required to provide raw data with respect to the paper for editorial review, and must be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if possible, and must in any case be prepared to retain the data. for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others that it has been properly quoted or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the study being reported. Everyone who has made a significant contribution should be listed as a co-author. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors. Corresponding authors must ensure that all suitable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are listed in the paper, and that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of the paper and have approved its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify them in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor of the journal or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.